I must have been to Nepal a dozen times without ever making the trip to
Lumbini, the birthplace of Buddha Gautama. This winter finally a visit materialised. Never having been to any of the important pilgrimage sites that Tibetans usually visit, I was hugely excited with anticipation, hoping to find fresh inspiration for my Dharma practice.
We rose at dawn to avoid the crowds and made our way on foot through the
lovely park covered in mist. The place was simple and serene. I couldn’t believe how modest and low-key the whole site appeared.
While my idea of Buddha was so grand, the place of his birth appeared so modest.
If the Buddha were born in China the place would be a glaring, overcrowded circus with exorbitant entrance tickets and all kinds of unrelated plastic
souvenirs on sale everywhere. Fortunately Lumbini was the pure
contrary: No sign of commerce, an oasis of calm and tranquility, a peaceful garden inviting visitors to remain for a while and reflect.
The whole park is extremely modest |
There we were in front of a simple white structure: The temple erected
for the Buddha’s mother, Queen Maya Devi, on the spot where she gave birth. We
removed our shoes and walked through the security gate. The guards checking our
bags asked where we were from. We've been taken for all kinds of nationalities
when travelling in Asia: Korean, Thai, Japanese. Heaven knows what they thought
we were but they smiled when we answered, "Tibet" - always the
spontaneous, non-rehearsed answer to this question. You can take the person out of Tibet but you can't take Tibet out of the person.
Walking towards the Maya Devi Temple |
Photographs inside the temple were not allowed. A Newari Pola offered Tibetan-style, full-body prostrations along the circuit leading to a wall of rock at the centre of
the building. The rock is said to display the contours of the Queen giving
birth under the tree. We touched it with our foreheads and remained in silence
for a moment. Then the children offered Khatas and bank notes and we remained for a while. In contrast to the holy sites in Tibet such as the Jokhang in
Lhasa, there was no shoving and pushing. There were no over-zealous monks on duty controlling the streams of pilgrims. Then we continued to
the pond behind the temple where the Queen Mother is said to have taken baths.
A friendly monk pointed out pilgrims are allowed to take a handful of the water for a blessing; a group of Thai Buddhists is meditating in the background |
Pilgrims circumambulating the Ashokan pillar |
Next to the temple was the historically important pillar erected by the
Indian ruler Ashoka. I learned that Lumbini was "discovered" in the
19th century due to the inscription on this pillar and the travel
accounts of the Chinese pilgrim Faxian.
Unfortunately there was no chance to catch a glimpse of the inscription as a large group of Singaporean pilgrims circumambulated the pillar which was fenced off. What does the inscription say? I'm still trying to find out. I only know it is said to be in Brahmi, the first written language of India used during Ashoka's reign in the third century BC.
Unfortunately there was no chance to catch a glimpse of the inscription as a large group of Singaporean pilgrims circumambulated the pillar which was fenced off. What does the inscription say? I'm still trying to find out. I only know it is said to be in Brahmi, the first written language of India used during Ashoka's reign in the third century BC.
As the hours went by more people started to poor into the complex. Besides
the large group of Thais and Singaporeans, there was also a delegation of Chinese monks in grey
robes, Korean believers, Newaris from the Kathmandu
Valley and a lot of Indians where I couldn’t figure out whether they were
pilgrims or tourists.
The contours of the Queen Mother at the rock inside the temple remained hidden to my eyes. I couldn't get close enough
to catch a glimpse of the inscription on Ashoka's pillar either. The rock and the pillar are the two main sanctuaries of Lumbini. Still I walked
away delighted and refreshed because I was able to derive a sense of serenity from the surroundings and for the first time, the deified Tibetan Buddha felt human. He felt so
close that for a moment enlightenment appeared reachable.
Coming out of the Tibetan tradition I am so used to think of the Buddha as a transcendental figure in a sea of other Buddhas, Bodhisattvas and deities. Everything that is associated with Buddha in my mind automatically had to be
golden, shiny, colourful with lots of décor, brocade hanging from the ceilings,
fragrant flowers and water bowl offerings everywhere - not to mention altars overloaded
with mountains of fruits, whole armies of bottled Coke and other soft drinks carefully arranged before piles of biscuits - only the best of
everything and in ample abundance. And enlightenment? It is understood as
something so high and difficult that it's almost arrogant for
someone to be thinking about it loud.
It was a bit sad to see that of all the Mahayana monasteries in Lumbini, none said "Tibet" - but then several of the listed monasteries practice according to the Tibetan tradition. |
The physical encounter with Lumbini also spurred an interest in the person
of the Buddha and early Buddhism: When exactly again was Siddharta Gautama
born? Who were his first disciples and how did he go about growing his Sangha? Which were
the main political events in his time? How long after Buddha did Ashoka appear
and what exactly was it he did that helped establish Buddhism? How did the Buddha’s
teaching differ from the other creeds in the area? Why did Buddhism disappear
in its homeland but was successfully exported to other countries? Where are all
the Shakya people who lived in the Lumbini area? Were they Newaris like the
Shakya in the Kathmandu valley? Was the Buddha a Newar? Approaching Lumbini
overland shows the place is located in a sea of ethnically Indian Hindus. Buddhism is non-existent. What
happened to the history of this place?
Loads of questions to which Tibetans usually don't get exposed. Our texts, the translated words of Buddha Gautama bka'gyur and the commentaries bstangyur, are intended to convince
readers of his message, not to give historically accurate information. To begin with, we have so much respect, there is no need for historicity. We don't ask for proof because we believe in all seriousness and from the heart. Preaching to the converted is a waste of time. But I suddenly felt a need to know more. Lumbini made me rediscover Buddhist history.
Only weeks before our departure to Nepal the BBC carried a story about a
new archaeological discovery in Lumbini saying right underneath the Queen Maya
Devi temple, they discovered the remnants of an ancient, possibly Buddhist
shrine dating to the 6th century B. C. implying we would have to
predate the Buddha's birthdate from approximately 484 B. C. to the 6th
century B. C. At once critics challenged the claim some going as far as doubting
the authenticity of Lumbini itself as the place of Buddha's birth.
So I began to read more and learned about
the disputes and politics generally involved with regard to determining the authenticity of the
various Buddhist excavations and discoveries on the Indian subcontinent. There are many
unknowns frequently encountered in archaeology. At one point when I didn’t know any
longer what to believe, suddenly the dogtooth story I heard as a child came to my
mind:
The Tibetan Amala with her dog's tooth that has grown Ringsel by the power of her pure devotion as illustrated in "The Power of Faith & Mindfulness" by Paljor Publications; New Delhi, 2010. |
Through the example of the old mother, Tibetan children learn about the importance of a pure heart and clean motivation. The accuracy of the object is secondary.
Maybe then historical accuracy with respect to Buddhist excavations and discoveries was not that important at all?
Once I heard the Lama say there are two kinds of practitioners:
Those with strong intellectual faculties who practice by mainly following wisdom
and those with weaker faculties who practice by mainly relying on faith. Both
paths, he pointed out, can lead to the goal if practiced with the correct
motivation.
In my case faith is weak and whatever wisdom I have tends to create doubt. Motivation, moreover, often becomes diffuse along the way. I realise I am not firmly
grounded in the Dharma: Depending on whether historical findings confirm or contradict the transmission, I get confused. Sometimes I am almost waiting for an encouragement
from science to bolster my faith.
But after Lumbini I have also become aware that historical research has its limits and that I cannot expect historicity or science to step in for my lack of faith. History cannot always back up the transmission. It is when the
two don't converge that I must come out and make my own decisions
based on wisdom from previous experience, a pure motivation and – yes, faith.
In a way Lumbini is a strange place. It's history interrupted and there are so many questions. But it also brought the Buddha home to me. In Lumbini I was able to see him as a “fellow
human being” hopefully making it easier to emulate his deeds.
Sarva Mangalam!
Mountain Phoenix Over Tibet
Related Essays